A conventional inner layer without the sealable version’s tuck-in flap
I would choose the ordinary top-loading Perfect Fit when adding an inner layer while keeping the setup simpler than a flap-style sleeve. The exact name matters: side-loading, sealable, and thick inners are distinct products.
Choose it if
You want a clear standard-size inner for a conventional two-layer setup.
Look elsewhere if
You specifically need a closed flap or a smaller Japanese-size sleeve.
The buying facts
| Pack contents | 100 clear standard-size inners |
|---|---|
| Opening | Top-loading |
| Role | Inner sleeve |
| Reference product | AT-13001 |
Will it fit?
Manufacturer-statedDragon Shield identifies this as the standard-size top-loading inner. Its general card-size guide is not an outside sleeve measurement. An exact cross-brand pairing needs evidence beyond the words standard size.
Which Perfect Fit is this?
The checked product is Clear Toploading, reference AT-13001. I would match that name before relying on a listing image or the broader Perfect Fit family. A seller may offer several opening styles in nearby listings.
Compared with Sealable Perfect Fit, the reason to choose this version is a simpler opening and no tuck-in flap. That tradeoff is useful when many cards move between decks and you do not want an additional closing step.
Cover the full deck
The stated 100-count pack covers one inner per card for a 100-card deck. Add regular playing sleeves separately, and allow extra inners for cards kept outside the main deck. Recheck the box after assembling all layers.
What to compare it with
Dragon Shield Sealable Perfect Fit — Clear Standard
Adds a tuck-in closure and an explicit manufacturer warning about deck thickness.
KMC Perfect Fit — Standard Topload
A comparable top-loading inner with published sleeve measurements.
Sources & verification
- Dragon Shield Perfect Fit — Clear Toploading Standard — manufacturer specifications — Manufacturer documentation. Verified 2026-09-26.